Home > Uncategorized > Saving the Glavin Center comes down to one man

Saving the Glavin Center comes down to one man

In many of the photographs that Rosemary Dumont has of her son Stephen, a red vertical wound can be seen at the top of his forehead, almost seeming to divide his forehead in two.

That wound is the result of Stephen’s habit of banging his head on any hard object near him, such as the corner of a table.  Before he was admitted to the Glavin Regional Center in Shrewsbury five years ago, he would open up the wound on practically a daily basis.

Community-based residences and hospitals tried to solve the problem with drugs, which didn’t work.  It got to the point where no community-based group home would keep or accept him as a resident.  At one point, the only place his parents, Rosemary and Will Dumont, were able to find for him was the controversial Judge Rotenberg Center.  There, Stephen was given electric shocks when he banged his head.  But that didn’t stop the behavior. 

The story was finally different at the Glavin Center where the staff have been able to reduce Stephen’s head-banging episodes to once or twice a year through constant supervision and supportive behavioral treatments.  Now, he’s able to go home to stay with his parents on weekends without the threat of a flare-up of his aggressive behavior.  Those home visits weren’t possible while he was in the community system.

The Dumonts know this “miracle” of treatment for their son will disappear when Glavin is closed, as the Patrick administration is moving quickly to do.   Not only is there no community-based setting that is likely to accept, much less successfully treat, Stephen, any change at all in his living arrangement is likely to trigger a descent into his old cycle of self injury. 

For Stephen, who has an intellectual disability in addition to having cerebral palsy and deafness, the act of leaving a long-term home such as Glavin and its staff and fellow residents results in a conviction that those people have all died.  “He loves all these people (at Glavin) to death,” Rosemary says.  “He can’t handle the change.”

For that reason, the Dumonts are desperate to keep Glavin open.  And they know that for now, the fate of the center rests with one man — State Senator Stephen Brewer of Barre.

Under the Legislature’s current budget process, it is totally up to Brewer whether to approve a state budget amendment that would require an independent cost analysis before the Department of Developmental Services can move more people out of Glavin and subsequently close the center.  Brewer, who is chairman of the powerful Senate Ways and Means Committee, has the authority to decide whether to place all proposed budget amendments in either a reject pile or a pile of amendments headed for a single up-or-down vote on the Senate floor this week.

So far, Brewer hasn’t given the Dumonts much reason for hope that he will accept the study amendment for the floor vote.  When the Dumonts and a small group of other Glavin family members met with Brewer earlier this month to urge him to allow the study amendment to reach the floor, Brewer told them that he “didn’t have the energy” to fight for the Glavin Center, Will Dumont said.  Dumont said Brewer referred to it as a “losing battle.”  The Dumonts, who live in North Brookfield, happen to be constituents of Brewer’s.

The administration is closing Glavin and three other developmental centers, contending they have become too costly to continue to operate.  The Dumonts and other supporters of the centers disagree with the administration’s cost analysis.  COFAR,  a family-supported nonprofit organization that I work for, maintains that the administration’s cost analyses for all of the centers have been flawed and that an independent study is needed.

COFAR moreover believes it would be cost effective to the state to expand the missions of Glavin and the other developmental centers by enabling them to provide medical and other hard-to-get services to community-based DDS clients.  Glavin, for intance, has long provided medical, dental, speech, psychology, guardianship and other services to intellectually disabled persons throughout central Massachusetts. 

It’s the hope of the Glavin families that an independent cost study will establish once and for all that the savings in closing the facility are illusory.  That, they hope, would convince the Legislature to block the administration’s plans to close Glavin.

But the administration strongly opposes an independent study, as does the Arc of Massachusetts and the Association of Developmental Disabilities Providers, which are vocal opponents of the developmental centers.  And Brewer has shown little inclination to oppose those organizations or the administration, as evidenced by his statement to the Dumonts about lacking the energy to fight for the facility. 

Yet, if the battle has been a losing one, that has at least partly been because of Brewer himself.  Last year, Brewer scuttled a similar independent study amendment, which had been filed by Senator Michael Moore of Worcester. Moore has once again filed the study amendment.  It would require that the cost study be done by a non-governmental entity selected by the state Inspector General.

Will and Rosemary Dumont are hoping this time they can scrounge up enough local support for Glavin that they can put some counter-pressure on Brewer.  Will Dumont has enlisted all his friends in his hunting club near his hometown of North Brookfield to call and email Brewer’s office.  Last week, Will, Rosemary and some other Glavin family members visited legislators’ offices in the State House.  Meanwhile, Rosemary has been signing up friends on Facebook to support the cost study, and said last week that her effort had “gone viral.”  Other Glavin families are making calls and sending emails as well and urging their friends to do so.

We may know whether their efforts have paid off by tomorrow when the Senate begins debate on the budget.  We hope Senator Brewer has enough compassion for the residents and families of the Glavin Center that he will at least put the amendment for the cost study into the pile for a Senate floor vote.

Advertisements
  1. ss
    May 22, 2012 at 1:33 am

    I’m not sure if I’m more appalled or disgusted that a “public servant” elected by the people to represent the people would even have the nerve to utter the words that he doesn’t have the energy to fight for the totally powerless and completely vulnerable people in his district. Used to be you could at least count on a politican to give you “lip service”. Now the severely developmentally disabled people of his district are even worthy of lip service.

    Even though the folks at Glavin have their hands full trying to save the lives of their familiy members from the mandates of an administration completely devoid of any human compassion, they should focus some of their collective efforts to see that Senator Brewer is not re-elected.

  2. SB
    May 22, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    Thank you for your support. I am hoping and praying Senator Brewer hears the pleas of those trying to save Glavin. This is not and should not be a political fight. It is his — and our — moral duty to protect those innocent people who cannot speak for themselves. This is a serious matter and the decision can literally save lives. It is a heavy burden for a politician or for anyone who has the power to make the choice to keep Glavin as a necessary option for the developmentally disabled. I pray Senator Brewer listens to his heart and to his conscience and passes this amendment. It is the right thing to do.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: