Home > Uncategorized > Fatal assault at Templeton Center raises questions about admissions and staffing

Fatal assault at Templeton Center raises questions about admissions and staffing

The death last month of an intellectually disabled man, who was allegedly assaulted at the Templeton Developmental Center by a resident there, appears to raise questions about the dangerousness of the people being admitted to the facility and the adequacy of the staffing and supervision there.

Dennis Perry, 64, was allegedly assaulted on September 16 by Anthony Remillard, 22, while the two men were working at the Templeton facility’s dairy barn.  At the time, Perry was a resident of a group home and was working in the barn on a daily basis.

The Worcester Telegram & Gazette reported that Perry had allegedly been shoved by Remillard into a boiler in the barn and suffered a serious head injury. The incident occurred in front of two staff members whose statements indicated the attack was unprovoked, according to the newspaper, which was quoting from a State Police report of the incident. Perry died on September 27 at UMass Memorial Medical Center.

Prior to his admission to Templeton, Remillard had been charged in a May 6, 2012 arson in a vacant building in Worcester, according to the newspaper.  At his arraignment on that charge,  prosecutors recommended that Remillard be evaluated at either Bridgewater State or Worcester State Hospital.  But the recommendation was rejected by the judge, and Remillard was allowed to enter a “pre-trial release commitment” at Templeton.

The Templeton Center, located in Baldwinville in central Massachusetts, has been marked for closure since 2008.  The facility is scheduled to be converted into state-operated group homes from its current status as an Intermediate Care Facility for the developmentally disabled (ICF/DD).

Paula Perry, Dennis Perry’s sister, said she and other family members were told by the Worcester County District Attorney’s Office that Remilard’s attorney didn’t feel that either Bridgewater State or Worcester State Hospital would be a safe environment for his client, and Remillard “was okayed to go to Templeton.” She said her family was unaware that there were any residents with criminal backgrounds or criminal charges at Templeton. They only found out about Remillard’s previous arrest on the arson charge after reading about it in the newspaper.

Paula Perry added that she understands that Templeton had the option of refusing to accept Remillard. “Why they would accept someone like that I don’t know,” she said.

While Templeton has historically accepted individuals with criminal backgrounds as residents, those persons have in the past been carefully evaluated as to their level of dangerousness prior to admission, according to Bonnie Valade, a COFAR Board member and the mother of a Templeton resident.

At this point, we don’t know if Remillard has an intellectual disability or not.  If he does have ID, it might have been appropriate to have considered him for admission to Templeton.   However, Dennis Perry’ death does appear to raise questions about whether Remillard should have been there and whether the staff supervision of him was adequate.  Here was someone who had an allegedly violent criminal past and who was allegedly capable of unprovoked violence. To us, the two linked questions here are:  Why was Remillard admitted to Templeton over the objection of the DA, and why was he allegedly able, once there, to attack and fatally injure someone?

We sent an email request on Monday to DDS Commissioner Elin Howe, seeking the Department’s policies and procedures regarding both admission to Templeton, and staff supervision of residents who have either behavioral problems or criminal convictions or charges on their records.  We want to know specifically whether persons who are not intellectually disabled are ever sent to Templeton, and whether any of the Department’s policies regarding admissions and staffing have changed since Templeton was slated for closure in 2008.

Since 2008, the Patrick administration has significantly phased down operations at  two ICFs/DD — Templeton and the Fernald Developmental Centers, and closed two others — the Glavin Regional Center and the Monson Developmental Center.  ICFs/DD are required to meet strict federal standards for treatment and staffing that do not apply to group homes and other community-based residential settings in Massachusetts and other states.

Since 2008, Templeton’s residential population has been reduced from 123 to 42.  Valade maintains that as the population there has gone down, both staffing and services at the center have been steadily reduced as well.  Here is what Valade had to say about Templeton in an email in the wake of Dennis Perry’s death.  The situation she describes may have a bearing on the case:

Shortly after the (Templeton) closure was announced, the staff that had been there started to leave. I was reminded that none were let go. Well, no one had to be told to leave…if you are told your place of employment is closing you look elsewhere for work. So they lost the best staff. These staff members had been there for years, which made them the best qualified staff I have ever known, and the clients felt like they were family.

… I am in fear for my son…with his issues he could have been the Dennis (Perry) or the Anthony (Remillard).  For years I have felt my son was in a safe environment, and now here I am worried sick about his care.

No one with a family member in the DDS system should be worried sick about their care.  The Department can help by providing answers as soon as possible to the questions we’ve asked about their admissions and staffing policies at Templeton.  And we hope the Department cooperates fully with the Perry family, in particular, in providing the answers they are seeking in this case.

Advertisements
  1. Barrie (sister of former resident)
    October 17, 2013 at 3:11 am

    Whether or not Remillard is intellectually disabled, I feel there should be no mixing of populations currently at Templeton. In other words, it is obviously not safe for the original ID population to be working or relaxing at the rec hall, etc, in the same facility with persons who have histories of violence. I think that is inexcusable. And I doubt the families were told their loved ones were expected to be exposed to that awful risk. There must be some gross violations of law or contract in that set-up.

    My heart goes out to Perry’s family, as well as to all the residents of Templeton who had considered the facility to be a safe home for the rest of their lives– and who now have to live in fear.

  2. October 17, 2013 at 3:54 pm

    As the post above notes, I asked DDS on Monday for their policies and procedures regarding admissions to Templeton and staff supervision of persons with criminal convictions, pending charges, or behavioral issues. I also asked whether there have been any changes in those policies in the past five years and whether Templeton has admitted any individuals who do not have intellectual disabilities.

    Yesterday, I received the following two-sentence reply from Victor Hernandez, DDS deputy assistant commissioner:

    “In response to your inquiry regarding the admission criteria to the Templeton Developmental Center (TDC), all individuals referred to TDC for admission must be eligible for supports by the Department of Developmental Services. Staffing and clinical services are individualized for each person and are designed to support the safety of the individual, other residents and members of the community. Over the years there has been an increase in the staff to client ratio at Templeton.”

    I was hoping for a little more specificity in DDS’s response. Of course, it’s possible they do not have any specific policies or procedures for admitting and supervising residents with behavioral issues.

    • October 17, 2013 at 6:11 pm

      Great job. Only one change I would have liked to see. Lasts sentence above, behavioral issues could have read behavioral issues coupled with past or potential criminal behavior.

  3. nancy Lucchetti
    October 18, 2013 at 12:29 pm

    I believe the man who did the shoving was suppose to be a one on one, was he? I would look into that. But of course they will lie!

  4. bonnie valade
    October 19, 2013 at 11:28 am

    In reply to the statement by DDS deputy assistant commissioner…if you individualize staff for clients that have behavioral issues, why and how did Dennis Perry end up as he did? Also, you neglected to tell us that in this incident the staff that was there at the time of the incident was a female staff….that is a great design to support the safety of the clients and the staff knowing the impulsive violence some of these clients are capable of.

  5. ses1
    October 20, 2013 at 12:49 pm

    If any one from DDS ever responded to an inquiry with any kind of detail or anything other than this standard statement they use for any inquiry into any situation I would probably fall off my chair. The only thing that is missing is “HIPPA” privacy rules as the excuse for providing no information.

    Its really difficult to believe that no one at DDS had the thought that mixing people with DD with people with violent criminal histories (with or without DD) could have dire consequences and was not appropriate. Or maybe the questions should be who thought this was a good idea?

    The real crime here is that DDS will get a pass on this, like they always do, and no one will be held accountable for placing Mr. Perry at risk. No one.

    My sincere condolences to the Perry family.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: