Home > Uncategorized > Sheltered workshops for the disabled win big reprieve in Massachusetts

Sheltered workshops for the disabled win big reprieve in Massachusetts

A major effort by advocates of sheltered workshops in Massachusetts to persuade state legislators and the Patrick administration that the workshops provide invaluable skills and activities for their loved ones with intellectual disabilities has paid off.

Last week, Governor Patrick signed the Fiscal Year 2015 state budget, which contains language protecting the workshops from closure.  The language states that the state must not “reduce the availability or decrease funding for sheltered workshops serving persons with disabilities who voluntarily seek or wish to retain such employment services.”

The passage of this language appears likely to cause at least a slowdown in the administration’s plans to close all remaining sheltered workshops in the state as early as next June.   The administration has contended that sheltered workshops “segregate” people with developmental disabilities from their non-disabled peers in the mainstream workforce. Supporters of the workshops, and we are among them, argue that the workshops provide needed skills and fulfilling work for people with intellectual disabilities, and do not prevent them from contact with peers in the community.

The protective workshop language survived a House-Senate conference committee late last month, and Gov. Patrick had until last Friday to line-item veto it, and chose not to do so.  So, it’s now the law.

The legislative victory is largely due to an intensive effort by workshop supporters to get the word out to key legislators — particularly to Rep. Brian Dempsey, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee — of the value of the workshops, and of the contention that the administration and corporate provider-based organizations such as the Arc of Massachusetts were spreading misinformation about them. Dempsey, in particular, has turned out to be a strong supporter of the workshops, particularly in the budget conference committee.

It remains to be seen whether the protective language will help people like Tom Urban, a 55-year-old man with Down Syndrome, who had been employed in a sheltered workshop for the bulk of his adult life, according to his brother and guardian, Richard.   Richard said that last December, he was informed that all sheltered workshops were being closed and that Tom would no longer be employed, as of the very next day, in his workshop, operated by Work, Inc., a Department of Developmental Services provider.

“To put it mildly, this was a rather disruptive change in Tom’s life with no opportunity to prepare him for this shocking development,” Richard Urban wrote in an email to Rep. Dempsey in late May.  “Moreover,” he said, “no chance was provided for me, as his brother, guardian and caretaker, to voice any opposition, or input, to this policy change imposed by (DDS).”

Richard said that although Tom “has limitations in a variety of areas, his work ethic and paycheck (from his sheltered workshop program) were two constants that allowed him a place on a playing field of equality with his peers, family and friends.”   Since his “forced exit from his workshop,” Richard added, Tom “has grown distant, is very confused, and expresses continued sadness over his job loss.  His identity, and work community, have been lost, through no fault of his own but by virtue of a policy shift for which I am at a complete loss to understand.”

The effort to close the workshops has been driven by an extreme anti-congregate care ideology that the Patrick administration subscribes to.  Simply because a group of disabled people work together in sheltered workshops, the administration considers it to be a “segregated setting.”  As a result, we are concerned that despite the budget language allowing those who are currently  in workshop programs to remain in them, people like Tom Urban, who have lost their workshop programs or are seeking for the first time to get into one will find not be able to do so.  Last year, the administration announced it would no longer allow new referrals to sheltered workshops in the state as of this past January.

In addition, the FY 2015 budget contains at least two reserve funds totaling $3 million to support the transfers of persons from sheltered workshops to provider-run day programs and unspecified job training programs.  While the administration contends that intellectually disabled people will all be able to reach their potential in mainstream or “integrated” work environments, there is  uncertainty over how many mainstream jobs really exist for most people with developmental disabilities, and many questions about what integrated employment really means.

Sheltered workshops have won a welcome reprieve in Massachusetts, but their future still remains uncertain; and also uncertain are the long-term prospects of fulfilling work activities for thousands of people with developmental disabilities in the state.

 

 

 

Advertisements
  1. Anonymous
    July 14, 2014 at 11:21 pm

    Yeah COFAR and all of the families that fought so hard on behalf of their loved ones. It is nice to know that grass roots efforts still work these days, legislators heard the concerns of their constituents and responded. Kudos to Representative Demsey for ensuring people with disabilities continue to have a choice in their services! A wholehearted thank you to all Representatives and Senators that were behind the movement. 😄

  2. A Very Concerned Parent
    July 15, 2014 at 2:49 pm

    In the statement “Simply because a group of disabled people work together in sheltered workshops, the administration considers it to be a “segregated setting.” Does that mean simply because a group of non-disabled people work together in the workplace, we should be considered working in a “segregated setting” also? Doesn’t it sound like they are distinguishing between the two in their own minds, which means they are also segregating them. Not sure if this makes much sense or if I explained it correctly, but it just frustrates me that they would uproot them from their known happy environment and disrupt their emotional and physical well-being. Yes, it is great to know that legislators heard our concerns and responded.

    • Anonymous
      July 17, 2014 at 5:24 pm

      You explained it correctly–it’s the administration that hasn’t explained what they are doing. Exactly who are the non-disabled peers of these disabled persons? By the administration’s standards, just about anybody could be considered segregated in their employment. So if I don’t work with a group of electrical engineers because I don’t have the skills and qualifications, then by the administration’s definition I’m segregated.

      The ideology excuse is just a ruse so they can dictate to the disabled what they can and cannot have, because they don’t care.

      And if sheltered workshops are segregating, then so aren’t elderly housing, college dormitories, schools, nursing homes…

  3. Patrick
    July 18, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    The Ohlmstead Decision said that Integrated Employment was preferred if “appropriate” and if the person with disabilities does “not oppose” it. The Administration, through the Dept. of Justice, is calling this the “integration Mandate”. IT IS NOT. Personal choice is part of the law and the agreement that they and certain states (MA, NY, ME, OR) are choosing to ignore in their rush to eliminate choice for workers and their families. Congrats to the families in MA for standing up to the know-it-all “do-gooders” who want to dictate their vision of perfection on those who are doing just fine without them!

  4. July 21, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    CT also has decided to ignore choices for CT people with disabilities to work in workshops where they have worked for many years and like it. CT needs some legislators and a Governor that will do the same thing and step up to the plate and let our sons/daughters work where they want to. What ever happened to their rights, options and choices? Lets hope CT will wake up and support the wishes of parents and their sons/daughters. Wake up CT and fight for our sons/daughters. The doors on our workshops swing both ways there are no locks on them. They come to us to work we don’t go out and pull them into our buildings. My daughter who is 54 years old and has Down syndrome loves it.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: